Repeal the 25th Amendment?   2 comments

Back in 1974, when Gerald Ford became vice-president without having been elected, there was a general movement to repeal or modify the 25th amendment. Oddly enough, this movement faded when Ford became president and then came back full force when Ford pardoned Nixon. There was a sense that the democratic process was not functioning properly.

It’s important to recognize that the 25th amendment was only seven years old when Ford became president. It was a widely-praised reform aimed at eliminating the likelihood that the Speaker of the House, third in line of official secession, would ever become President. At the time, it was argued that Speakers were elected only by their district, which might be a tiny fraction of the population and parochial in their view point. It never occurred to anyone that the President and Vice-President might both by forced from office by disgrace within a single term.

The 25th amendment allows the President to fill a Vice-presidential vacancy, pending Congressional approval. There were several ideas for fixing what was seen as a usurpation of democracy.

Representative Julia Butler Hanson suggested a simple repeal, which the Senate constitutional subcommittee considered holding a special national election when a Vice Presidential vacancy occurs. Sen. John Pastore of Rhode Island thought the national special election should occur only if that unelected VP were to be followed by an opening in the Presidential office. Sen. Robert Griffin of Michigan introduced a constitutional revision that would have eliminated Vice Presidential candidates from the general election ballot, having Congress select the Vice President after the election.

The proposal died in commitee in 1974 after Hansen chose not to run for reelection and there’s been no serious moves since then to repeal it, but Soda Head and the Daily Kos were both discussing it in recent weeks.

2 responses to “Repeal the 25th Amendment?

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Reblogged this on That Mr. G Guy's Blog and commented:
    Imagine Obama and Biden are impeached and the only resort is John ” Crying” Boehner.


    • We have no good options. Obama and Biden impeached sounds good to me. Boehner’s crying doesn’t bother me. It’s a biochemical reaction to strong emotion. It’s more common in women than in men, but my dad used to suffer from it too. It doesn’t mean weak-mindedness. My dad made plenty of strong decisions, even if Disney could make his eyes shine. My issues with Boehner come from his long-term voting record and his lack of spine. He could be completely dry-eyed and still be a political slinky. I wouldn’t want him in the White House … on the other hand, the current idiots should be impeached, so ….

      Yeah, no good choices. How did we get in this situation? Too much voting and not enough exercise of our sovereignty as American citizens.


What's Your Opinion?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Elliot's Blog

Generally Christian Book Reviews

The Libertarian Ideal

Voice, Exit and Post-Libertarianism


Social trends, economics, health and other depressing topics!

My Corner

I write to entertain and inspire.

The Return of the Modern Philosopher

Deep Thoughts from the Shallow End of the Pool

Steven Smith

The website of British steampunk and short story author


a voracious reader. | a book blogger.


adventure, art, nature, travel, photography, wildlife - animals, and funny stuff


The Peaceful Revolution Liberate Main Street


What could possibly go wrong?

Who the Hell Knows?

The name says it all.

%d bloggers like this: