Archive for the ‘conservation’ Tag

Alaska Natives Embrace Drilling at Ground Zero for Climate Change Debate   Leave a comment

Barrow, Alaskahttp://www.eenews.net/stories/1060024122

It’s a rather long article that deserves a read, so follow the link, but the synopsis is that most Alaska Natives favor oil and gas development … especially if it is done by an Alaska Native corporation.

For the record, I do too. Alaska cannot survive on tourism alone. We need real long-term year-round jobs and the gas and oil industry, particularly if Alaska based, can provide that. Alaskans deserve the opportunity to support ourselves that every other citizen on the United States has … or had before the environmental movement decided to save us from ourselves.

Posted September 1, 2015 by aurorawatcherak in Energy

Tagged with , , , ,

Active forest management is health for our forests | Juneau Empire – Alaska’s Capital City Online Newspaper   Leave a comment

Active forest management is health for our forests | Juneau Empire – Alaska’s Capital City Online Newspaper.

Carnivores in the neighbourhood – The Hindu   Leave a comment

This is a great article that really confronts many of the environmentalist contentions that have become acceptable gospel around the world. And, notice, it’s not American ultra-conservatives asserting this.

Carnivores in the neighbourhood – The Hindu.

Not Your Grandfather’s Mining Regulation   Leave a comment

Part 3 of 3

This is a reprint of another article in the Alaska Contractor magazine. Similar to the last one, I’ve added graphics

________________________________________

by Bob Loeffler

Americans have become much more sensitive about the environment than they were a generation ago, and laws to protect our air, water and land have improved dramatically. The practices and results that were common in previous generations would be a matter of criminal penalty today. There has been a regulatory and cultural shift since the advent of Earth Day and enactments of the National Environmental Protection Act in 1970.

These changes have dramatically affected today’s mining operations. In fact, there has been a much-needed, steady improvement in mine regulation and practices in the past 40 years – and you can see it in the positive environmental record of Alaska’s miners.

Changes began in the 1970s. Congress passed the National Environmental Policy Act (which requires Environmental Impact Statements for proposed projects), the Clean Air Act, and the Clean Water Act. It also established the Environmental Protection Agency and passed comprehensive regulation for the coal industry.

Despite the laws of the 1970s, it took some time before the regulators, industry and science caught up with the new environmental sensitivity. In 1985, the EPA reported that “Date on management methods at mining facilities indicate that only a small percentage of mines currently monitor their ground water, use run-on/run-off controls or liner, or employ leachate collection, detection and removal systems.” The regulations, science and required protection measures we not take for granted were just being implemented in the 1980s and 1990s. But by 1999, a National Academy of Sciences study prepared for Congress concluded that the “laws and regulations that provide mining-related environmental protection is complicated but generally effective.”

Because of the obvious differences between new and old mines, regulators and industry generally refer to old mines as legacy mines. Legacy mines were generally designed and constructed with inferior environmental standards and practices, compared with mines of today, and statistics bear that out.

One recent study looked at hard-rock mines the EPA has placed on its National Priority List as superfund clean-up sites. The study found that there were 53 hard-rock mines on the EPA’s list: 47 were permitted in the pre-regulatory era (before 1970), six were authorized in the transition era (before 1989) and none was permitted after 1990. The study confirmed what those in the industry know – that changing regulations and practices have clearly improved mining’s environmental performance.

The changes in regulatory standards are reflected in the history of Alaska’s mining laws. Our first hard-rock mines since World War II began operation in 1989. At that time, Alaska had no requirement that mine operators reclaim land they had disturbed and no requirement for operators to provide financial assurance that mining sites would be reclaimed. Alaska allowed mining companies to disturb the land and leave it disturbed.

In 1990, the Alaska Legislature passed a mine reclamation requirement for state, federal and private land in Alaska. The law became effective October 1991. It also required that mines put up funds for reclamation (a reclamation bond) before they began operation. But the reclamation bond required in the new law was designed for placer mines, which were then the dominant part of the industry. The maximum amount of the required bond was less than the amount needed to reclaim hard-rock mine sites.

Between 1991 and 2004, four hard-rock mines were authorized on state land. Each of these operations voluntarily agreed to submit financial assurance for the entire mine disturbance, even thought it was greater than the law required.

In 2004, the Alaska Legislature with the support of state agencies, the mining industry and some environmental groups changed the law to require full reclamation bonding for hard-rock mining. Beginning in July 2004, the state required all mines to put up a bond to cover the full reclamation cost before the mine begins operating. All mines in Alaska have updated their bonds since the law was passed.

Alaska has a unique requirement as part of its mine permitting, a requirement no other state has. All states require mines to monitor their performance to make sure they live up to permit requirements. Agencies also monitor and inspect the performance. But Alaska has an innovative requirement that goes one step further. We hire someone to monitor the agencies.

Every hard-rock mine regulated by the state requires a third-party audit every five years. A consultation firm is hired to audit both the mine’s compliance with permit requirements and the state agencies’ inspection and administration of those requirements. The auditing firm makes recommendations for improving operations and regulation, and the subsequent audit investigates whether the previous recommendations were implemented.

These changes – as well as the fact that Alaska’s hard-rock industry is young, with no legacy mines, have resulted in an Alaska mining industry with an excellent record of protecting the environment, particularly water quality and fish. Agency monitoring tells us that fish downstream of all Alaska’s hard-rock mines are as populous and healthy as they were before the mines existed.

Today, Alaska has a strict and realistic “set of requirements to regulate mining, and our mining industry has an enviable environmental record. That’s not to say that the laws and regulations are perfect. The future will no doubt bring challenges and make it clear that we can make even more improvements. But with the regulatory requirements currently in place, there is no excuse to permit a mine that would degrade the environment, especially water quality or fish habitat. And that almost certainly would not have been true of mines developed in your grandfather’s time.

Bob Loeffer is a part-time Visiting Professor at the Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, and the partner in the consulting firm, Jade North LLC. For seven years, he was director of the Division of Mining, Land and Water within the Alaska Department of Natural Resources.

Posted May 3, 2013 by aurorawatcherak in Alaska, Conservation, History, Mining

Tagged with , , ,

Choking on the Clean Air Act   Leave a comment

Again, examples of bureaucratic overreach stemming from the administrative state are easy to find. Consider the Clean Air Act. Alaskans are certainly forced to every winter, when our need not to freeze to death runs up hard against the cost of available heating resources and the EPA’s unrealistic expectations for “clean air.”

Over the past 40 years, the EPA has incrementally expanded regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act. Currently, an unprecedented expansion of regulation is jeopardizing electric reliability, jobs, US competiveness, and state economies. American air quality has improved dramatically over the past four decades, yet the EPA has become more aggressive. Under the CAA,the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has broad regulatory authority to enforce laws intended to protect public health and the environment. The current EPA, however, has misused this authority in pursuit of an economically damaging, anti–fossil fuel energy policy—a policy that Congress has repeatedly rejected.

The CAA needs major reform. After 40 years of air quality management under the Clean Air Act, federal policies need to absorb the dramatic improvement in our nation’s air—a condition quite different from when the CAA was enacted. Congress should reclaim its constitutional authority to make major policy decisions about air quality in order to forestall the unnecessary economic and human damage already flowing from the current EPA’s reckless aggression. Congress needs to clarify and strengthen the original CAA’s recognition that the primary authority to manage air quality resides with the states. The state and local governments’ direct accountability to real people has catalyzed creative and cost-effective solutions to air quality problems in stark contrast to the heavy-handed control, bureaucratic red tape, and scientifically unjustified regulatory mandates characteristic of the EPA’s approach.

Federal air quality policies need to incorporate fundamental principles of individual liberty, private property, and the free market. Improvements in air quality over the past 40 years have been driven by innovation, efficiency, and economic growth. Economic liberty has powerful environmental benefits because liberty promotes objectivity, science, creativity, investment, and problem solving.

On a regulatory spree unprecedented in U.S. history, the EPA is churning out new rules with unparalleled speed, scope, stringency, costs, and job loss, but without rigorous scientific justification or measurable benefits. Since 2009, the EPA has, without supporting data, assumed health risks at pollutant concentrations already far below the established federal standards to protect human health. The science underlying the current EPA’s regulatory onslaught is deeply flawed.

Over 20 new regulations pose cumulative economic impacts of a magnitude never before experienced. The National Electric Reliability Council (NERC) predicts that four of the rules aimed at electric utilities could mean the abrupt loss of 8% of the country’s electric generation capacity by 2015. Over 100 electric generating plants have announced closure, withdrawing 53,000 megawatts of electricity from the grid. Coal-fired electric generation has fallen from 50 to 36% of U.S. electrical generation capacity since 2009. Utilities have announced sharply higher electric rates for consumers.

Here in Fairbanks, Alaska, we must heat our homes. Our winters regularly drop to 50 BELOW zero degrees Fahrenheit. An average 2000 sq. foot home takes about 150 gallons of home heating diesel a month to keep around 68 degrees. Home heating diesel is $3.97 a gallon. That’s about $600 a month and we heat our homes from the middle of October through the first of May, for about $5000 a year to heat our homes. That’s a huge part of our annual expenses, so many of us supplement with fire wood. In fact, about 10% of homes here heat almost exclusively with wood. Wood costs $350 a cord for birch and a 2000 sq. foot home will go through about six cords a winter, costing about $2000 a year to heat your home. The sane among us can see the advantage, I’m sure. That’s $4000 a year we can use for something else … and there is always some other expense that claims it.

The EPA says that burning firewood violates air quality standards. Except that anyone who has lived in Fairbanks for five decades like I have knows that our air quality is immensely better than it was 30 years ago. I’ll be using the example of Fairbanks throughout this topic to show the human face of EPA overreach.

Inside My Mind

Words from my brain

Happiness Between Tails by da-AL

Tales of Writing + Books + Compassion + Culture + Wagging Tails

Fairfax and Glew

Vigilante Justice

The Wolf's Den

Overthink Everything

SaltandNovels

Sprinkling wonder into writing

Remmington Reads

A book enthusiast bringing you all things bookish

MiddleMe

Becoming Unstuck

Magical BookLush

A New Dimension to Explore!! Love for books and series is all we need. Life can be lonely without books. All I love is books, series, and talking about serious causes like bodyshaming. Do join me if you love to live your life to the fullest

Jacquie Biggar-USA Today Best-selling author

Read. Write. Love. 💕💕💕

Not Very Deep Thoughts

Short Fiction and Other Things

Ediciones Promonet

Libros e eBooks educativos y de ficción

the dying fish

Book info, ordering, about me etc. in upper right

%d bloggers like this: