Archive for the ‘Tyranny’ Category

Whatever Happened to the 4th Amendment?   Leave a comment

“The Fourth Amendment was designed to stand between us and arbitrary governmental authority. For all practical purposes, that shield has been shattered, leaving our liberty and personal integrity subject to the whim of every cop on the beat, trooper on the highway and jail official.”—Herman Schwartz, The Nation

The Fourth Amendment supposedly protects us from unreasonable searches of our homes, businesses and persons and seizures of our possessions and papers. It’s become no more than a paper barrier assaulted by a water pistol under a prevailing view among government bureaucrats that they have the right to search, seize, strip, scan, shoot, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for any reason.

Image result for image of the 4th amendmentIf you follow the link above, you’ll find a detailed description of forced cavity searches, blood draws, breath-alcohol tests, and DNA extractions. In the course of conducting our every day lives, we are coerced into submitting to forced eye scans and inclusion in biometric databases. And that’s just the tip of a huge iceberg. Americans are being forced to accept that we have no control over our bodies, our lives and our property, especially when it comes to interactions with the government.

Worse, on a daily basis, Americans are being made to relinquish the most intimate details of who we are—our biological makeup, our genetic blueprints, and our biometrics (facial characteristics and structure, fingerprints, iris scans, etc.)—in order to clear the nearly insurmountable hurdle that increasingly defines life in the United States. We are constantly reminded that we are now guilty until proven innocent.

Americans are being threatened with arrest and carted off to jail for the least hint of noncompliance. Homes are being raided by police under the slightest pretext. Property is seized on the slightest hint of suspicious activity. Roadside police stops have devolved into government-sanctioned exercises in humiliation and degradation with a complete disregard for privacy and human dignity.

Consider, for example, what happened to Utah nurse Alex Wubbels after a police detective demanded to take blood from a badly injured, unconscious patient without a warrant. Wubbels refused, citing hospital policy that requires police to either have a warrant or permission from the patient in order to draw blood. The detective had neither. Irate, the detective threatened to have Wubbels arrested if she didn’t comply. Backed up by her supervisors, Wubbels respectfully stood her ground only to be roughly grabbed, handcuffed, dragged out of the hospital and forced into an unmarked car while hospital police stood by, unable to intervene without risking arrest themselves. Here’s the police body camera footage, which has gone viral. You can see what happened for yourselves.

Michael Chorosky didn’t have an advocate like Wubbels to stand guard over his Fourth Amendment rights. Chorosky was surrounded by police, strapped to a gurney and then had his blood forcibly drawn after refusing to submit to a breathalyzer test. “What country is this? What country is this?” cried Chorosky during the forced blood draw.

Image result for image of the 4th amendmentYeah … I don’t know either. Is this still the United States of America? It kind of looks like the former Soviet Union or communist China.

Unfortunately, forced blood draws are minor compared to some of the indignities and abuses being heaped on Americans in the so-called name of “national security.” Think about forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies and forced roadside strip searches. These are becoming commonplace in an age in which police are taught to have no respect for the bodily integrity of mere people who may not have done anything wrong.

Charnesia Corley, 21, was pulled over by Texas police in 2015 for “rolling” through a stop sign. Claiming they smelled marijuana, police handcuffed Corley, placed her in the back of the police cruiser, and then searched her car for almost an hour. No drugs were found in the car. You’d think they would then take off the handcuffs and apologize profusely for being overzealous … but, no … that’s not the country we live in now.

The Houston Chronicle reported:

Returning to his car where Corley was held, the deputy again said he smelled marijuana and called in a female deputy to conduct a cavity search. When the female deputy arrived, she told Corley to pull her pants down, but Corley protested because she was cuffed and had no underwear on. The deputy ordered Corley to bend over, pulled down her pants and began to search her. Then…Corley stood up and protested, so the deputy threw her to the ground and restrained her while another female was called in to assist. When backup arrived, each deputy held one of Corley’s legs apart to conduct the probe. No drugs were found on Corley’s person

The cavity search lasted 11 minutes. The street slang for this practice is “rape by cop.” Is anyone surprised that it is common enough to have developed street slang?

Corley was charged with resisting arrest and with possession of 0.2 grams of marijuana, those charges were subsequently dropped. The full dash-cam video was released to the Houston Chronicle and can be viewed here.  Two of the officers who conducted the search, William Strong and Ronaldine Pierre, were indicted in June 2016 by a Harris County grand jury on charges of official oppression, but those charges were dropped, apparently because we think this is behavior cops ought to engage in on a more regular basis..

David Eckert was forced to undergo an anal cavity search, three enemas, and a colonoscopy after allegedly failing to yield to a stop sign at a Walmart parking lot. Walmart parking lot … isn’t that private property? Cops justified the searches on the grounds that they suspected Eckert was carrying drugs because his “posture [was] erect” and “he kept his legs together.” So, this guy had good posture. That’s a crime now? No drugs were found.

During a routine traffic stop, Leila Tarantino was subjected to two roadside strip searches in plain view of passing traffic, while her two children—ages 1 and 4—waited inside her car. During the second strip search, presumably in an effort to ferret out drugs, a female officer “forcibly removed” a tampon from Tarantino. No contraband or anything illegal was found.

Angel Dobbs, 38, and her 24-year-old niece, Ashley, were pulled over by a Texas state trooper on July 13, 2012, allegedly for flicking cigarette butts out of the car window. Insisting that he smelled marijuana, the trooper proceeded to interrogate them and search the car. Despite the fact that both women denied smoking or possessing any marijuana, the police officer then called in a female trooper, who carried out a roadside cavity search, sticking her fingers into the older woman’s anus and vagina, then performing the same procedure on the younger woman, wearing the same pair of gloves. No marijuana was found.

Gerald Dickson, 69, was handcuffed and taken into custody (not arrested or charged with any crime) after giving a ride to a neighbor’s son, whom police suspected of being a drug dealer. Despite Dickson’s insistence that the bulge under his shirt was the result of a botched hernia surgery, police ordered Dickson to “strip off his clothes, bend over and expose all of his private parts.” No drugs or contraband were found.

Four Milwaukee police officers were charged with carrying out rectal searches of suspects on the street and in police district stations over the course of several years. One of the officers was accused of conducting searches of men’s anal and scrotal areas, often inserting his fingers into their rectums and leaving some of his victims with bleeding rectums.

It’s gotten so bad that you don’t even have to be suspected of possessing drugs to be subjected to a strip search.

A North Carolina public school allegedly strip-searched a 10-year-old boy in search of a $20 bill lost by another student, despite the fact that the boy, J.C., twice told school officials he did not have the missing money. The assistant principal reportedly ordered the fifth grader to disrobe down to his underwear and subjected him to an aggressive strip-search that included rimming the edge of his underwear. The missing money was later found in the school cafeteria.

Suspecting that Georgia Tech alum Mary Clayton might be attempting to smuggle a Chick-Fil-A sandwich into the football stadium, a Georgia Tech police officer allegedly subjected the season ticket-holder to a strip search that included a close examination of her underwear and bra. No contraband chicken was found.

Forced searches span a broad spectrum of methods and scenarios, but the common denominator is complete disregard for the rights of the citizenry.

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Florence v. Burlison, any person who is arrested and processed at a jail house, regardless of the severity of his or her offense (minor traffic offense, for example), can be subjected to a strip search by police or jail officials without reasonable suspicion that the arrestee is carrying a weapon or contraband.

Examples of minor infractions which have resulted in strip searches include:

  • individuals arrested for driving with a noisy muffler
  • driving with an inoperable headlight
  • failing to use a turn signal
  • riding a bicycle without an audible bell
  • making an improper left turn
  • engaging in an antiwar demonstration

Police have also carried out strip searches for:

  • passing a bad check
  • dog leash violations
  • filing a false police report
  • failing to produce a driver’s license after making an illegal left turn
  • having outstanding parking tickets
  • public intoxication
  • failure to pay child support can also result in a strip search

As technology advances, these searches are becoming more invasive on a cellular level, as well.

For instance, close to 600 motorists leaving Penn State University one Friday night were stopped by police and, without their knowledge or consent, subjected to a breathalyzer test using flashlights that can detect the presence of alcohol on a person’s breath. These passive alcohol sensors are being hailed as a new weapon in the fight against DUIs.

Those who refuse to knowingly submit to a breathalyzer test are being subjected to forced blood draws. Thirty states presently allow police to do forced blood draws on drivers as part of a nationwide “No Refusal” initiative funded by the federal government. Not even court rulings declaring such practices to be unconstitutional in the absence of a warrant have slowed down the process. Now police simply keep a magistrate on call to rubber stamp the procedure over the phone.)

The National Highway Safety Administration, which funds the “No Refusal” DUI checkpoints and forcible blood draws, is also funding nationwide roadblocks aimed at getting drivers to “voluntarily” provide police with DNA derived from saliva and blood samples, reportedly to study inebriation patterns. In at least 28 states, including Alaska, there’s nothing voluntary about having one’s DNA collected by police in instances where you’ve been arrested. At least in Alaska, you have to be have been convicted of a crime. All of this DNA data is being fed to the federal government.

Airline passengers, already subjected to invasive pat downs and virtual strip searches, are now being scrutinized even more closely, with the Customs and Border Protection agency tasking airport officials with monitoring the bowel movements of passengers suspected of ingesting drugs. They even have a special hi-tech toilet designed to filter through a person’s fecal waste.

Iris scans, an essential part of the U.S. military’s boots-on-the-ground approach to keeping track of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, are becoming a de facto method of building the government’s already mammoth biometrics database. Funded by the Dept. of Justice, along with other federal agencies, the iris scan technology is being incorporated into police precincts, jails, immigration checkpoints, airports and even schools. School officials—from elementary to college—have begun using iris scans in place of traditional ID cards. In some parts of the country, parents wanting to pick their kids up from school have to first submit to an iris scan.

As for those endless pictures everyone so cheerfully uploads to Facebook (which has the largest facial recognition database in the world) or anywhere else on the internet, they’re all being accessed by the police, filtered with facial recognition software, uploaded into the government’s mammoth biometrics database and cross-checked against its criminal files. With good reason, civil libertarians fear these databases could “someday be used for monitoring political rallies, sporting events or even busy downtown areas.”

Our Founders could scarcely have imagined a world in which we need protection agains widespread government breeches of our privacy down to the cellular level, yet they had the good sense to create the 4th Amendment to prevent government officials from searching an individual’s person or property without a proper warrant and probably cause (evidence that some kind of criminal activity is going on). We desperately need to return to the bedrock of this Constitutional protection because the indignities we all undergo from agents of America’s police state are just a taste of what will come in the future if we continue to allow the government to undermine our rights.


With every court ruling that allows the government to operate above the rule of law, every piece of legislation that limits our freedoms, and every act of government wrongdoing that goes unpunished, we’re slowly being conditioned to accept a society in which we have little real control over our bodies or our lives and to come to believe that is normal.

Posted October 13, 2017 by aurorawatcherak in Tyranny

Tagged with , ,

Presidents of Mass Murder   1 comment

That didn’t take long!

In case you missed it, Donald Trump has joined the gallery of presidents who are killers.

Gotta be tough. Gotta show the terrorists who’s boss.

An 8-year-old girl was killed after being shot in the neck during a US SEAL raid in Yemen. Supposedly it was raid on Al Qaeda, but the grandfather of the murdered girl claims that this was an enclave of tribal sheikhs fighting the Yemeni govenrment … the government that is supported by Iran-backed Houthis. The 8-year-old daughter was the daughter of Anwar al-Awlaki, the radical cleric and U.S. citizen who was killed in a drone strike in 2011.

Eight years old? Was Nawar al-Awlaki a terrorist? Or was she just a little girl with a famous daddy who got caught in the cross-fire of an unjust attack?


More than a dozen civilians were also killed in the operation, but we American were supposed to be in mourning for the SEAL team member who was also killed by people defending their own lives.


Anwar al-Awlaki, her father, was killed in 2011 in a CIA-led U.S. drone strike, marking the highest-profile takedown of terror leaders since the raid on Usama bin Laden’s compound. He was also a US-born American citizen, who became a militant Islamic cleric who became a prominent figure with Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. He was involved in several terror plots in the United States in recent years, using his fluent English and Internet savvy to draw recruits to carry out attacks. President Obama signed an order in early 2010 making him the first American to be placed on the “kill or capture” list.

White House spokesman Sean Spicer claims the raid yielded an “unbelievable amount of intelligence.”. A defense official told the Associated Press that the mission was planned by the Obama administration but authorized by Trump. Then a US official told Reuters that surveillance of the compound was “minimal, at best.”

“The decision was made … to leave it to the incoming administration, partly in the hope that more and better intelligence could be collected,” that official said.

In other words, the Trump administration could have waited indefinitely to conduct this raid and thereby saved the lives of all those civilians, including an 8-year-old girl whose only “crime” was having the “wrong father” who died when she was only a year or two old.


Before you start freaking out about how horrible and war-mongering Donald Trump is and how we should have elected Hillary Clinton, let’s not forget that she was Secretary of State when Obama dropped that drone on an American citizen without benefit of a trial. And it wasn’t the last time.

Two weeks after the killing of Awlaki, a separate CIA drone strike in Yemen killed his 16-year-old American-born son, Abdulrahman, along with the boy’s 17-year-old cousin and several other innocent Yemenis. The U.S. eventually claimed that the boy was not their target but merely “collateral damage.” Abdulrahman’s grief-stricken grandfather, Nasser al-Awlaki, urged the Washington Post “to visit a Facebook memorial page for Abdulrahman,” which explained: “Look at his pictures, his friends, and his hobbies. His Facebook page shows a typical kid.”

While you could logically (but not legally or Constitutionally) justify killing the father for his activities, there is no argument for killing his children. There is no evidence they were involved in terrorism and they were American citizens who had a right to a trial.

Few events pulled the mask off Obama officials like the death of Abdulrahman. It highlighted how the Obama administration was ravaging Yemen, one of the world’s poorest countries. This man made a mockery of the Nobel Peace prize, so no one can claim he is a better man than Donald Trump or George W. Bush. They’re all murderers. Bush at least seems to regret some of it and at least he didn’t target American citizens.

In a hideous symbol of the bipartisan continuity of U.S. barbarism, Nasser al-Awlaki just lost another one of his young grandchildren to U.S. violence.


Posted February 4, 2017 by aurorawatcherak in Tyranny

Tagged with , , ,

Thought for Monday   Leave a comment

“During the next hundred years, the question for those who love liberty is whether we can survive the most insidious and duplicitous attacks from within, from those who undermine the virtues of our people, doing in advance the work of the Father of Lies. “There is no such thing as truth,” they teach even the little ones. “Truth is bondage. Believe what seems right to you. There are as many truths as there are individuals. Follow your feelings. Do as you please. Get in touch with your self. Do what feels comfortable.” Those who speak in this way prepare the jails of the twenty-first century. They do the work of tyrants.”

Posted August 1, 2016 by aurorawatcherak in Tyranny, Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

Partially Deaf, Blind in 1 Eye, Paralyzed, and Easily Confused   Leave a comment


July 7, 2016

What crushing irony: over the weekend of July 4, as Americans celebrated their alleged freedom, the TSA graphically proved yet again our total enslavement.

The outrage in question actually dates to June 30, 2015; it’s only now hitting the headlines thanks to Hannah Cohen’s lawsuit. But last year, when she was 18, Hannah tried to fly with her mother to their home in Chattanooga from Memphis, TN. The duo were pros at this route, having traveled it “hundreds of times” over the last 17 years, “without incident ever,” to treat Hannah at St Jude’s Medical Center. This particular trip was special since it was the final one.

Hannah probably inspires everyone around her. Though she’s suffered “damage from radiation and removal of a brain tumor that substantially limits her ability to speak, walk, stand, see, hear, care for herself, learn work, think, concentrate, and interact with others,” she frequently braves commercial aviation, a gauntlet that daunts even the strongest and healthiest. Her mother, Shirley, “a professor of nursing at a university in Chattanooga,” summarizes Hannah’s condition as “partially deaf, blind in one eye, paralyzed, and easily confused…

Source: Partially Deaf, Blind in 1 Eye, Paralyzed, and Easily Confused

Confirmed: FBI Introduced Florida Shooter to ‘Informants’   Leave a comment

New York Daily News in their article, “FBI spied on Orlando gay club terrorist Omar Mateen for 10 months in 2013: FBI Director James Comey,” would admit (emphasis added):

Mateen first appeared on authorities’ radar in 2013 after the security guard’s colleagues alerted the FBI to inflammatory statements he made to colleagues claiming “family connections to Al Qaeda,” according to Comey. 

Mateen also told coworkers he had a family member who belonged to Hezbollah, a Shia network that is a bitter enemy of ISIS — the network he pledged allegiance to the night of the carnage, Comey noted.

The FBI’s Miami office opened an inquiry into Mateen. 

“He said he hoped that law enforcement would raid his apartment and assault his wife and child so he could martyr himself,” Comey said. 

Source: Confirmed: FBI Introduced Florida Shooter to ‘Informants’


Interesting! This is immediately where my thoughts went upon hearing about this guy (I won’t say his name because he doesn’t get to live in infamy if I have anything to say about it. Why isn’t the media talking about this being yet another government-sponsored terrorist “sting” … only this time, it got away from them? Lela

Posted June 16, 2016 by aurorawatcherak in Tyranny

Tagged with , , ,

The Deep State Takes Care of Its Own   2 comments

“You have to trust the government,” Justice Department attorney Richard Roberts unctuously told Jesse Trentadue. Seeking to understand why his younger brother Kenneth had died while in federal custody, Jesse, a trial attorney in Salt Lake City, had asked to see the findings of a federal grand jury investigation of the case.

In an incandescent response to Roberts’s patronizing dismissal, Trentadue reminded the Justice Department functionary that the proper relationship between citizens and the government is not one of “trust,” but rather of “accountability from that government to the citizens.”

Source: The Deep State Takes Care of Its Own

Posted March 26, 2016 by aurorawatcherak in Tyranny

Tagged with , ,

Scary Scenes Followup   2 comments

So in the wake of the Brussels attacks, Americans of course look inward. This article from the Alaska Dispatch News is indicative.

WASHINGTON – The apparently coordinated bombings that killed more than 30 people in Belgium are unlikely to be duplicated in the United States, which is separated by an ocean from Islamist extremists fighting in Syria and Iraq and has seen far fewer of its people traveling there, former intelligence and counterterrorism officials said.

Of course, we’re not immune to attack and we shouldn’t be complacent, but I cringe when I hear folks saying we need police in the streets and armed guards in the airports, schools, etc.


We shouldn’t be so afraid of terrorism that we allow our government to act like terrorists. A friend of ours was in Belgium when the attacks happened. She’d been in the impacted airport just five hours before. She emailed us to let us know that she and her husband were okay and in her email, she talked about how truly frightening it was to have these armed men in the streets, dressed in camouflage and carrying fully-automatic rifles in the ready position. She was especially put-off by the balcavas. “Who is they are guarding their identity from? Terrorists or the people they are terrorizing?” Jenna and Tom were stopped trying to get to their hotel, held for 45 minutes their bags and persons searched twice (though nothing but the usual tourist on the street things were discovered) and their passports retained. They just got those back yesterday, which has made them late for the European trip they were planning. In fact, after the attacks, they had planned to go on to Germany early (“We certainly didn’t need to be in the way here.”), but they couldn’t without their passports. Why were their passports retained? No one will tell them. Our consulate in Brussels was able to get them back, but without explanation.

And, yet, there are Americans who think we need to that sort of scrutiny here. I find it particularly telling that these same people are usually the ones who want to disarm private citizens. “Just let the police and the military handle it,” they say. The military especially is not your friend, folks. I speak from the experience of a lifetime living in a huge military town and being friends with many soldiers, both active and retired. The retired ones will tell you that they were trained to be terrorists. In the last 20 years (it started in the Clinton administration), soldiers have received specific training in US crowd control — “What to do in the event of a homegrown uprising?” is how my friend PJ refers to it. Kendell tells me that training included intense classroom “encounter sessions” designed to “break down our attachment to our neighbors and our natural reflex to protect American lives.” PJ says he would never fire on American civilians, “not even the President ordered it.” Kendell says he wouldn’t want to, but he would if ordered by a commanding officer. Levi sent a chill down my back when he said “Well, if they’re truly Americans, they wouldn’t be fighting our army. We’re on the same side. They should just calm down and let us do our jobs.”

Wow! That’s all I can say about that. Wow! I did ask Levi to give me specifics and it included things like home searches, demanding to see papers, detaining people for “routine” screening, and pretty much everything you would expect of the Stasi. Levi is scarier than some. Most of them are reasonable folks who would at least feel badly about doing it, but Levi really has bought into the whole mentality that the military is always right and that civilians should recognize that and bend to their will.

So, when I see jack-booted thugs patrolling the streets of Brussels with rifles at the ready, I will now remember what Jenna wrote in her email.

“A terrorist attack could happen at home, but I hope this response never does. I’d rather risk a terror attack than live under constant terror from my own government.”

And this comes from a woman who lives in Fairbanks Alaska where it’s estimated that at any public gathering in Fairbanks, at least 10% of the attendees are carrying concealed. I would rather put my life in the hands of a well-meaning neighbor who really doesn’t want to shoot anybody, but wants to be ready if trouble comes his/her way than rely on the judgment of someone who has been trained to kill and sees everyone not wearing camo as a threat.

Posted March 25, 2016 by aurorawatcherak in Tyranny

Tagged with , , ,

Scary Scenes   Leave a comment

I haven’t been ignoring the Brussels attacks, but I had a busy week at work and I caught a cold so really haven’t had time to blog about it.

No argument – the Belgians have been through a rough time and have every reason to be scared. I mourn for the loss of life and hope the terrorists will be caught and punished.

But … as Brad and I watched the news from Brussles, we both felt horribly uneasy and it took our teenager to point out why.

A look at these pictures tells the story. Police, in camouflage and balacavas, with fully automatic weapons at the ready, crowding the streets, search bags and asking people for their papers.

Does this make anyone safer? It certainly didn’t stop the terrorist attacks in the first place. And then the American press gets ideas from it. “We need that here!” A government official says it’s not politically correct to say that here, but we “need that sort of vigilance.”

Bull! NO, WE DO NOT!

How much freedom of speech do you suppose goes on in the plazas of Brussles under the watchful eyes of the highly armed police? Those guys look pretty intimidating to me.I think they’re meant to look intimidating and I’m willing to bet that a substantial slice of the Belgian population does not feel warm and fuzzy when they see them.

They give up essential liberty for temporary security deserve neither. Benjamin Franklin

And, it doesn’t make the Belgians any safer because not they’ve just exchanged one form of terror for another form of terror. Maybe it’s because I grew up in a military town and know a lot of soldiers, but the idea of them patrolling my streets under the pretense of “keeping us safe” fills me with cold dread. The last thing any people needs is a bunch of armed control freaks under government auspices “protecting” us. It’s not protection. It’s tyranny.

When are we going to realize that government is the larger sponsor of terrorism that our world has today? The Belgians may not experience another bombing for a while, but they will get to experience tyranny every day from now on.

Wake up, people!

Posted March 25, 2016 by aurorawatcherak in Tyranny

Tagged with , ,

Why Aren’t We Addressing This?   15 comments

VolunteerI find it fascinating that the only Hispanic ethnics in the race for President are both calling for stronger immigration reform than Hillary Clinton, but I am dumb-founded that the socialist is the race is actually proposing that we secure the borders. Of course, Sanders has done the math and knows that socialism only works in countries with way more resources than people who use government services and at the rate we’re going, due in large part to the influx of illegal Mexican immigrants, we won’t be able to achieve his socialist ideal because of too much pressure on the system from low-skilled “citizens”.

Let’s reiterate a point. I am FOR immigration. My grandfather was from Stockholm. My mother’s grandparents were from Canada. I support LEGAL immigration. You decide you want to work in the United States, you apply for a visa, you wait your turn, you enter at a point of embarkation, you submit your periodic paperwork, maintain employment, and in five years (or however long it takes you so long as you don’t break the law and keep submitting your paperwork) you take a test and sit for an interview and you become an American citizen, laying aside your allegiance to your country of birth to take up allegiance with other American.

If during your period of resident alien status, you break the law, you are deported, no discussion. We should treat immigrants no better than we treat our own homegrown felons, who lose their civil rights, can’t get jobs, etc. If you forget to file your paperwork, some leniency should be given, but if you’ve moved houses, jobs, etc., in a way that suggests an attempt to defraud, then you should return to your country of origin and wait for your next legal opportunity to come to the United States. If we followed this system strigently, we could allow many more LEGAL immigrants into this country, but we have to address the issue of illegal economic migrants first.

If you entered the country illegally, you are by definition a lawbreaker who is taking jobs away from low-skilled American workers. (There is a fairly direct correlation between the unemployment of American teenagers and the numbers of economic migrants in any given community). I feel sorry for the otherwise good people who have chosen to violate our laws by entering our country without our permission, but I might also feel sorry for the burglar I find eating out of my fridge some morning. That doesn’t mean I won’t call the cops on him. Sorry, but if you entered the country illegally, you should be deported, no discussion.

But what about the children these people had while living in our country?

What about them? Children belong to their parents. They don’t belong to the government of the country they were born in. If their parents choose to return to their country of origin, the children go with them. The United States government doesn’t try to stop them. So why are we conversely allowing lawbreakers to remain in our country because they managed to squeeze out a kid on the US side of the border. The United States government is the only first world nation that allows automatic citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants within their borders. European countries have specific laws stating that children born to foreign nationals within their borders are NOT citizens.

But the United States wants to be compassionate and the 14th amendment ….

I am not altogether certain that the 14th amendment requires birthright citizenship for the offspring of illegal migrants. Anyone reading the 14th amendment with their logic cap on knows that the persons being discussed there were born on US soil to parents who were born on US soil. They had been slaves and there’d been a slave importation ban in the United States for 60 years prior to the Civil War. Like most Constitution amendments written during times of national stress, the 14th was not well thought out. It’s the 19th century equivalent of the 18th amendment, which we later repealed with the 21st. It meant to solve a problem and created dozens more. We learned from that mistake. I don’t know why we can’t learn from this one. It could be repealed or amended.

Congress won’t touch it! They’re afraid of it being said that they’re trying to institute slavery once more. They will continue to ignore this and many other issues until our country is destroyed by the unaddressed issues of national debt, a burdensome health care regulation, crushing regulatory interference in commerce, loss of checks and balances, a growing felony class, refusal to reform entitlements, and uncontrolled illegal migration and the resultant economic consequences. Congress is surrounded by 3rd rails and they’re not going to act.

That’s why Article 5 allows the states to call a convention to discuss amendments, because our Founders were prescient enough to recognize that government always grows out of control to the point where the people must once again restrain it. An Article 5 convention of the states is not without risks, but it is preferable to the civil war that will eventually happen if we continue the way that we have been.

Nevada Rancher Highlights Larger Issue   Leave a comment

Cliven Bundy’s fight with the federal government over his cattle grazing on public lands highlights a much larger issue than one Nevada cattle rancher and a bunch of beefs.

The federal government (illegally) claims ownership of 80% of the land in Nevada and substantial portions of most other western states. They have all sorts of arguments for why this is a good idea, but rancher Bundy shows why it isn’t. Like Alaska, when Nevada became a state, the citizens living there were promised that they would have access to the lands controlled by the federal government. Bundy’s family built their ranch with that contract in mind. They thought they were dealing with themselves. They thought if the federal government ever let the land for private sale, they would be given the option to buy it.

How do I know that? My grandfather and his brothers owned homesteaded land next to open grazing land in the Dakotas. My grandfather was a farmer with a small herd of dairy cows, so his use of open range was limited, but his brothers made wide use of it to build up cattle herds. There were ranchers in that area who had created a cooperative for the purpose of purchasing that land to continue as open range if the opportunity came about. Private cooperative ownership was what they expected, although I’m sure there were rich ranchers in other communities who thought they would buy the land for themselves.

Most of that area of the Dakotas is now locked up or requires expensive grazing fees. Yet the ranchers remember the promises. As Alaskans remember the promise that we would have access to the federal lands here in our state. Alaska actually had that in writing until the Statehood Compact was passed and then kept from us until after the plebiscite.

The ranchers and Alaskans thought they were dealing with their own government — their servant, not their master.

The federal government has replaced King George!

What are we going to do about it?

Numen da Gabaviggiano

Nada como tus ojos para sonreir

Lines by Leon

Leon Stevens is a poet, science fiction author, and composer. Writing updates, humorous blogs, music, and poetry.

Valentine But

Books: fiction and poetry

Faith Reason And Grace

Inside Life's Edges

Elliot's Blog

Generally Christian Book Reviews

The Libertarian Ideal

Voice, Exit and Post-Libertarianism


Social trends, economics, health and other depressing topics!

My Corner

I write to entertain and inspire.

The Return of the Modern Philosopher

Deep Thoughts from the Shallow End of the Pool

Steven Smith

The website of British steampunk and short story author


a voracious reader. | a book blogger.


adventure, art, nature, travel, photography, wildlife - animals, and funny stuff

%d bloggers like this: