Archive for April 2014

Pipeline work began 40 years ago: Born out of an energy crisis, the monumental project reshaped Alaska – Fairbanks Daily News-Miner: Editorials   Leave a comment

Pipeline work began 40 years ago: Born out of an energy crisis, the monumental project reshaped Alaska – Fairbanks Daily News-Miner: Editorials.

Posted April 25, 2014 by aurorawatcherak in Alaska

Tagged with , , , , ,

Peril of Living in Alaska   Leave a comment

Skagway ferry dock sinks – Fairbanks Daily News-Miner: Alaska News.

The people of Skagway are fine. It’s a grand adventure. Like Valdez last winter, they have other ways to get where they need to go and the local community will band together to make sure everybody  is okay.

Posted April 25, 2014 by aurorawatcherak in Alaska

Tagged with , , ,

Modern Idolatry   55 comments

There are many idols in this world. We don’t tend to think of idol-worship in our modern society. We are so sophisticated that we don’t make graven images to bow before. That doesn’t mean we don’t have idols. Any time a Christian puts anything higher than God, it becomes an idol. Even our government can become an idol if we put obeying it above our obligation to obey God.

Here in the United States, many Christians insist that we must support our government and obey it, even as it does things that are cruel, greedy, murderous and godless. If you point out where the US government has gone astray, they will cite Romans 13 and a handful of other passages to assert that Christians must never, ever disobey the government because that is tantamount to disobeying God.

So they plunk down their tax money and they send their sons and daughters off to war, to pay for and participate in assassinations, unjust wars, taxpayer-funded abortion, drone strikes, and attacks on American citizens (such as Ruby Ridge). They don’t complain and often they cheer.

When President Obama authorized a drone strike murder on American citizen Anwar al-Alwaki I objected on two grounds — one that he was an American citizen and therefore supposed to be protected by the Constitution and two that our government should not be using drones to kill anyone. If we are a nation founded on the rule of law, then simply sneaking up on someone we suspect of terrorism is not good enough. Innocent until proven guilty, right to a fair trial, right to face your accusers … and all that. Yet, many of my fellow Christians informed me that I didn’t have a right to judge the government as abusive and out of control because of … Romans 13.

It goes further than that, however. God gave us the right of liberty (1 Peter 4:15), which our Constitution acknowledges, but the American government tells us what we must do, own, buy, sell, and consume. Our Constitution sets forth protections for criminal and civil procedings in a way reminiscent of the cities of refuge and the trial in the gate system of Israel, yet our government recently has given itself the power to arrest and incarcerate without evidence or trial. God gave us the right of property (Exodus 20:15), which is recognized in the Founding documents, but the American government imposes coercive taxes, confiscates possessions, and tells us what we can and cannot own. God gave us the right of privacy (1 Peter 4:15), acknowledged by the 4th amendment, but the American government gave itself license to spy on us through our computers, telephones, and records and by means of cameras, drones and even our neighbors.

If God granted these rights and safeguards them through His divine law, then it reasonably follows that man has no authority to take them away. That used to be understood in the United States and was enshrined in our constitution, but in recent times we have given ourselves the right (through the government) to define and even take away the rights of other men, thus attempting to dethrone God and replace Him with the government.

Does that seem like an overblown statement?

In a society that is supposedly founded on self-government, when the government steals, coerces or murders, it does it in your name. Christians are called in the Bible to refrain from such activities, but when our government engages in them, it does so on our behalf … though increasingly against us.

To obey a government without question because you believe God has required you to obey it even as it violates His commands is as much idolatry as Caesar declaring himself God!

On Biblical Liberty   Leave a comment

It’s always a good idea to keep in mind that the letters and histories of the New Testament were written in a particular order. Scholars have pretty much teased out the time line. James wrote his letter to the Christian diaspora (an overwhelmingly Jewish Christian population) sometime before the Jerusalem Council in AD 49. Not long afterward, Paul wrote two letters to the brand-new church at Thessalonica and almost immediately wrote to the churches in Galatia. Although the books of the New Testament are not organized in that manner, this chronology is important because it explains certain emphases in the subject of each letter.

Even in AD 49, a mere 14 years after Christ’s death, the Christian churches had some concept that the gospel gave liberty — James 1:25 says to keep their attention on the “law of liberty” and James 2:12 warns them to conduct their lives as people who are judged under liberty. In other words, they could sin and not be condemned, but they shouldn’t because they loved God. Jesus had said believers would know the truth and the truth would set them free. Free from what? Free from the authority of “words on stone tablets” (2 Corinthians 3:7). Believers would be free to worship God not in a place, under a specific authority, but in their spirit, wherever they went. This did not mean they were free of God’s authority, but that they were free of man-made religious authority.

Paul would expand upon this concept of liberty, in Galatians 5 (which was one of Paul’s earliest letters written not long after the Jerusalem Council) and then later in both letters of the Corinthian church. There is no question that the early church believed they’d been set free of the authority of Judaism. The entire letter to the Galatians represents Paul’s attempt to teach Gentile Christians that they did not need to be Jews to be good Christians. They had been taught to this erroneous belief by false teachers who had failed (or rejected) the teaching that the truth would set them free … not free to sin, but free to worship God within a cultural concept that is in line with God’s will.

And, then came the letter to the Romans.  Before we get to Romans 13, it benefits us to look at Romans 8:18-21: “For I consider that our present sufferings cannot even be compared to the glory that will be revealed to us. For the creation eagerly waits for the revelation of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility – not willingly but because of God who subjected it – in hope that the creation itself will also be set free from the bondage of decay into the glorious freedom of God’s children.”

There’s no question that the New Testament Christians believed they lived in God’s liberty. They were directly under the authority of God, not any man-made institutions.

So, once again, why did Paul write Romans 13 and what did he mean by the words he penned?

On Human Bondage   Leave a comment

The apostle Paul had been a Pharisee and Jewish legal scholar before his encounter with Jesus Christ on the road to Damascus. Jews believed that society and culture were based upon instructions originating from God the Father and not from humans. They saw no difference between the social, legal or political systems of their day. They were all one and the same. As a Jew, Paul would have had no objection to a legalistic social order so long as that society was based upon God’s word. All of Jewish life was based on a theocratic political system in which there were no distinctions between social, political or religious spheres.

In the early years of Israel, the people were largely free to conduct themselves within their tribes as they saw fit. Tribes selected leaders and conflicts where resolved by consultation with “judges”, who spoke for God. Later in their history, the Israelites demanded a king. God warned that they wouldn’t like what they got, but they insisted. However, even the king was subject to the authority of God. He didn’t rule in his own right. He answered to God. When Saul turned out exactly how Samuel had warned he would, God allowed him to destroy himself and replaced him with David — a (flawed) man after God’s own heart who knew that he was answerable to God. Even David let the power go to his head and he stumbled and when you read the account of the kings, there are few that followed God and more that followed the lust of their power. Many of the kings of Israel chose to worship idols as well.

Ancient Israel is recorded in the Bible as frequently needing to repent of building temples to idols and joining with nearby pagan cultures in practices of which God did not approve. By Paul’s time as a young student in Jerusalem, the Pharisees comprised about 20% of the population. They had devised a very strict religious code to help steer themselves and their society away from the moral degradation of the greater Greek society around them. They met with some success, but their king was still a hot mess.

By Jesus’ day, there was still the understanding that God was the ultimate authority, but the political system of Israel was entangled with the Roman Empire. Being as Israel had been a theocracy, the political system’s entanglement with the Roman Empire meant the religious system of Israel was very much in the thrall of the Empire, even though the people didn’t realize it.  Jesus challenged both the authority of the Temple and of the Roman government. His authority came from a much higher source than either of these two hierarchies, which is why — apart from it being God’s will — they killed Him. Christians understand that it as a wholly spiritual event pre-ordained for salvation, but from a secular political view, Jesus died because He was civilly disobedient. The Temple authorities thought He was bucking their power structure (He was, just not in the way that they thought) and the Romans thought He meant to proclaim Himself king (He was, just not in the way that they thought).

Understanding Christian relationship with the state starts with the understanding that in order to serve God, we may have to break the law.

Actor Chris O’Dowd Equates Religion With Racism   Leave a comment

Actor Chris O’Dowd Equates Religion With Racism.

And, for an example of what Sorbo is talking about ….

Kevin Sorbo: ‘God’s Not Dead’ Star Takes Stand Against Christian Persecution   Leave a comment

Kevin Sorbo: ‘God’s Not Dead’ Star Takes Stand Against Christian Persecution.

Merely Mugged   3 comments

Christians in the 1st century, non-Catholics throughout the Middle Ages, Christians in the Middle East, China, and Myanmar ….

Just examples of Christians who were/are murdered and muzzled simply because they believe that Jesus Christ exists and He is the Answer for what ails the world.

By contrast, Americans are merely mugged. We face social embarrassment and some political hurdles for our beliefs, but nobody is trying to kill us … yet. The Chinese Christians say that American Christianity would be much more vital if we actually faced persecution. Maybe if we risked death or imprisonment for our beliefs, we’d understand the difference between a compelling cause for Christ where we must make a stand and a mere inconvenience where we might want to consider our witness before we get on our high horses.

On the other hand, in a nation founded on natural rights and liberty, all citizens must be eternally vigilant to secure those rights not just for ourselves, but for our fellow citizens.

How do Christians walk that line in a society where religious liberty is threatened with suppression, but not actively persecuted? Should we?

If Hobby Lobby et al are told to tow the ObamaCare line and pay for abortifacients … should they fall in line or is it time for civil disobedience from Christians?

 

When we’re merely mugged and not murdered, what should our response be, Christians?

 

Balancing Act   4 comments

Every day, Christians are called to be citizens of heaven rather than of earth. We may live in the United States or Russia or South Africa or China, but we are in this world and not of it. The apostle Paul understood that. The gospel didn’t come just for the Jews. Jesus died for everyone who will accept God’s grace by faith. And that brought Paul and his fellow 1st century Christians into conflict with the government authorities. By their very existence as a people, they were in violation of the civil authority of the government.

So why did Paul write what we designate now as Romans 13? Because he knew, better than most, that Christians were going to be murdered, muzzled or mugged by the world around us. Our every day lives will always be in conflict with the societal standards around us. We should probably think something is wrong with our Christian walk if we are NOT in conflict with the world around us because Jesus warned us in John 4 that we will have grief for no other reason than that we believe in Him.

So if we’re already in conflict with the world simply for believing in Jesus, why not also be in conflict with the government that opposes our beliefs? Why would Paul write Romans 13 if we were already in conflict by believing what we believe?

The first human born on this planet killed the second human born on this planet because he perceived his brother’s existence was somehow defrauding him of his “due”. Many centuries later, God used the writer of Hebrews to commend the murdered brother for his faith. This ought to tell us something about ourselves. We are bent, fallen, given to having our feelings hurt by imagined slights and to inflate minor slights into major conflicts.

Paul wrote Romans 13 because he knew this about human nature. He recognized that Christianity would always be in conflict with the world because the world is in conflict with God, but he also recognized that we could spend our energy railing at injustice rather than ministering on God’s behalf. We can become known as the people who resist the government rather than the people who walk in Christ’s way and that can and will diminish the gospel of Jesus Christ. By damaging our own witness through political activity rather than through godly works, we become salt that is good for nothing but to melt ice.

Which brings us to the question …

Should Christians ever be civilly disobedient?

Rep. Young blasts regulatory sprawl during Fairbanks visit – Fairbanks Daily News-Miner: Local News   Leave a comment

Rep. Young blasts regulatory sprawl during Fairbanks visit – Fairbanks Daily News-Miner: Local News.

I’m still voting against him in the primary because I think he should retire, but it’s hard not to like Alaska Representative Don Young!

Who the Hell Knows?

The name says it all.

Rebellious Hazelnuts

Surreal Stories, Very Tall Tales

Adjusting My Sails

When the wind doesn't blow the way you want, adjust your sails

Stine Writing

Poetry, Positivity, and Connecting!

Writer vs the World

In search of beauty, inspired by literature.

Inside My Mind

Words from my brain

Happiness Between Tails by da-AL

Tales + Tales: Books + Compassion + Culture

Fairfax & Glew

Vigilante Justice

The Wolf's Den

Overthink Everything

SaltandNovels

Sprinkling wonder into writing

Remmington Reads

A book enthusiast bringing you all things bookish

MiddleMe

Becoming Unstuck

Magical BookLush

A New Dimension to Explore!! A reason to Love and A promise to fight the wrong is hidden in Books. Come, Let's Explore it!!!

Jacquie Biggar-USA Today Best-selling author

Read. Write. Love. 💕💕💕

Not Very Deep Thoughts

Short Fiction and Other Things

%d bloggers like this: